Father Ernetti and the philosopher’s stone

And there will be many ‘experts’ who say that the speed of light is not yet transcendent or that time is linear and it is not possible to do many things that I propose in these pages, I know. I offer this site to these people and say that the whole truth of what Black Ops and other agents of real knowledge are after is not under the control of NASA or the Smithsonian and other public or relatively transparent structures of academia and government. Here’s a site worth checking out that looks at some of the things that many have known about for a long time. It does not include the Catholic scholar / physicist who has reportedly developed a chronovisor along with input from Werner von Braun and Fermi that would be similar to something the Philosopher’s Stone could accomplish ([http://www.lerc.nasa.gov/WWW/bpp/TM-107289.htm]).

“Father Pellegrino Maria Ernetti (1925-1994) was a Benedictine priest, scientist, and a world-class authority on” archaic “music (pre-Christian to the 10th century AD). He claimed to have linked quantum physics to the occult arts to build a time machine: the chronovisor. Father Ernetti said that he had traveled to Rome in 169 BC. C. to witness a representation of the now lost tragedy, Thyestes, of the father of Latin poetry, Quintus Ennius. He claimed to have used the chronovisor to watch Christ die on the cross. Why would such a distinguished clergyman feel the need to connive with such a story? Is the Vatican suppressing the full truth of the life and achievements of Father Ernetti? (1)

It is correct to say that there are many impressions of what the Philosopher’s Stone is or what The Philosopher’s ‘Great Work’ could actually be. There have probably been some who consider themselves alchemists who have misled the general public about it on several occasions due to the Inquisitions, just as happened with another of the alchemist’s missions. I am referring in this case to the homonunclus or artificial man that was created by Thomas Aquinas and his mentor and former Dominican bishop Frater Albertus Magnus. They were almost as Divinely Inspired as Constantine in their response to the agents of the heresy trial they were about to face.

Personally, I would award Constantine the Peabody Prize for Marketing like him (a Mithra worshiper who was deified by his sons at the time of his death in the pagan custom of the Roman Empire builders, which also made many of his relatives murdered in horrible ways at that juncture.) co-opted the teaching of Christ. In my opinion, Christ was an alchemist just like his ancestors, including Solomon and Melchizedek. The intrigues are many to say the least. Today most people still think that there is some truth to the lie that alchemists were hermits seeking to turn lead into gold and yet that was the wish of totally materialistic medieval kings and nobles. Alchemists like me have to live the existence of a hermit if (like me) they are not willing to sell themselves, but many of them are in the bowels of hegemony. They encouraged many fakirs to claim that they had the ability to do things that they could not do.

Aquino and Frater Albertus (much admired by one of the Illuminati founders – Goethe) said that their homonunclus was “the talking head of Jesus”. Now what could have really been what they did? I suggest that they were in the process of making a stone and had a way of predicting certain events that people like Edward Kelley did. It is said that he too had a stone and that England’s greatest scholar (and spy), John Dee, believed in Kelley. But I think Aquino and Magnus had the same thing Kelley had: a stone or a skull. The skulls found in Mexico have a relationship of artifacts of many millennia in ancestor worship throughout the ages and all cultures have had some type of shamanic people who were attuned through them.

I know this is not a complete answer and there is no way I can give a real and complete answer in a few pages. The lies of those who hide knowledge are equaled by the lies of those who seek or fear knowledge.